20141218–A welcome update/retraction from flickr
If you are a flickr member you may have seen at least one of these high profile commentaries about flickr’s recent shenanigans:
Jeffrey Zeldman: WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE? FLICKR IS ABOUT TO SELL OFF YOUR CREATIVE COMMONS PHOTOS
Thomas Hawk: The Controversy Around flickr Selling Creative Commons Licensed Photos
Cnet: Some photographers bristle over Flickr’s selling of photos
PetaPixel: Flickr Taking Heat from CC Photographers for Selling Their Work as Wall Art Without Compensation
“More than 300 million publicly shared Flickr images use Creative Commons licenses, making it the largest content partner. Yahoo last week said it would begin selling prints of 50 million Creative Commons-licensed images as well as an unspecified number of other photos handpicked from Flickr.” –WSJ
The default license on flickr is “©All Rights Reserved”, unless you change your default license to one of the Creative Commons Licenses which allows others to use your uploaded photos. Since signing up in 2006, at least 99% of my images have been tagged either © or licensed under a BY-NC-ND Creative Commons License (the same license in my site’s sidebar) and therefore, thankfully, not eligible for this new “feature.”
“Yahoo says it is complying with the terms of Creative Commons by selling only images that permit commercial use.” -WSJ
While there may be nothing illegal about what flickr is doing with images that have a Creative Commons “Attribution” License**, there is a very wide moral chasm between an individual ordering a printed wall art image from their own photostream and flickr offering those same images for sale to 3rd parties.
Come on flickr! Don’t be that guy.*
(*from the flickr “Community Guidelines“)
** Just to clarify, the images being sold by flickr are any images that have a CC License that does not include the “Non-Commercial” clause, not just those that only have an “Attribution” License.